Copyright (c) 2001 Hans-Peter Nilsson. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with the Invariant Sections being just "Location of the original", with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License". The programs in the slides are put in the public domain; the slides themselves are covered by the GNU Free Documentation License as above.
This document is a webbification of some slides and notes presented at the MMIXfest 2001, October 6 in Munich, Germany, hosted by the Computer Science and Mathematics Department, Munich University of Applied Sciences.
You are encouraged to report errors in the original document or opinions about it to email@example.com.
The original of this document is located at http://bitrange.com/mmix/mmixfest-2001/mmixabi.html.
(No changes since the original webbification on 2001-10-10.)
I'll present an ABI based on Knuth's documents. I want your opinions about some details where I'm undecided. I'll also sketch a few details of an alternative ABI.
Performance of programs for the MMIX architecture relies on keeping as many variables as possible in registers, to minimize memory accesses by other means than through the register stack and instruction fetches. So first hand, registers should be used rather than a traditional memory stack.
Another goal is for the assembly code to be usable as input for further modification by a human. The generated code should as far as possible be compatible with mmixal and conventions in Knuth's texts. There are currently (2001-10-10) some non-conformance issues, which will be fixed wherever possible.
It is described (in [ref 1]) that parameters are usually passed in registers $0 and up, as seen by the called function. Further, the return address is passed in rJ, using PUSHJ and PUSHGO for function calls and POP for returning ([ref 3]). Return values are put in $0 and up, as seen by the returning (called) function.
In [ref 2], it is mentioned that $255 is used by mmixal for instruction expansion under control of the -x option. This happens when loading out-of-range addresses, making register $255 unsuitable for literal use in assembly programs. At the same place, it is suggested that functions that need a memory stack can use $254 as a stack pointer and when necessary, $253 as a frame-pointer.
The number of local registers (the value of special register rG), is defined to never be lower than 32. It is also recommended (in [ref 1]) that a program should not assume more than 32 available local registers. This number is higher than most human-written C-functions will use anyway. Therefore, the number of incoming or outgoing registers used for parameters cannot reasonably be higher than 32. In an attempt to keep things simple (and to work around restrictions in GCC), it seemed best to split that number even for incoming and outgoing parameters; the number of registers used for parameters is 16.
Hopefully, this should also minimize the number of register moves necessary to get incoming registers "out-of-the-way" when calling other functions.
Please note that register $16 being an outgoing parameter register is just a first approximation. I'll explain briefly the GCC-related issues later. The 17:th parameter and beyond are passed on the stack, with $254 (the stack-pointer) pointing to the first parameter in the called function.
Just as mmixal does, the GNU binutils uses register $255 for its own purposes when loading addresses. GCC also uses it for temporary purposes in some cases, but only for instructions that the assembler and linker will not expand.
The stack pointer $254 is set up in the code between Main and main, and must have the same value when a function returns as when it was entered.
If register $253, the suggested frame-pointer, is used in a function, it must likewise be saved so it has the same value at function exit as at function entry.
The GCC implementation reserves a few registers.
There's a GCC extension for nested functions, that for some codes circumstances need to pass a context pointer; a pointer to the local variables of the enclosing function when a pointer to a nested function is passed to another function. That pointer is passed in register $252.
Register $251 is used for the structure return pointer. Registers $247..$250 are used for C++ exception handling, and registers $231.. $246 are reserved for the GNU ABI. There is no need for a function to preserve these register values, but it must be prepared that a called function may change them.
This is just the current (2001-10-10) work-in-progress mapping. These allocations are not final, and some of the uses can certainly share the same register. For the imaginary typical MMIX programmer these allocations should not matter, as they do not collide with GREG-allocated registers (unless the program is short on registers).
MMIX can handle 8, 16, 32 and 64-bit data. A reasonable mapping of C types exposes all these sizes so e.g. a C programmer wanting to write for MMIX can do it simply by using standard types. The fundamental address unit type in C is char (sizeof char is always 1), so BYTE maps naturally to it. The C "char" type is by default signed, because this is the case for most gcc ports and therefore would presumably lead to the fewest compatibility problems. The rest of the normal C integer types are "short int", "int" and "long int". They naturally map to wyde, tetrabyte and octabyte. Incidentally, this is the same mapping as the alpha gcc port uses. The gcc type "long long" has to map to octabyte, otherwise cross-compilation from a 32-bit host is not possible. This is a gcc restriction, but might not matter too much, since on a "long long" is usually also 64 bits, this being natural for existing 32-bit hosts.
The normal C floating point types are float, double and long double. MMIX has 64-bit IEEE floating point quantities and limited operations on 32-bit quantities, "short floats". They naturally map to double and float, with long double an alias for double.
Each of the fundamental types must be mapped to an address at least a multiple of its size, so called "naturally aligned". To be theoretically addressable with a GETA, individual variables are aligned to tetrabyte alignment.
Similarly for structures, the structure layout has members naturally aligned, with padding inserted where necessary. The alignment of a structure is that of its largest contained type. The size is a multiple of that type, with padding inserted at the end of the structure.
If a parameter fits in a register, it is passed by-value, with integer types extended to 64 bits by the caller. Otherwise, it is passed by reference (as a pointer to the original), and the called function has to copy it, in case it needs a local modifiable copy.
The same goes for parameters passed on the stack; integer types are promoted, passed as 64 bits, with larger-than-64-bit types passed by reference.
Scalar values are returned in $0 as seen by the calling function. We usually don't have to worry about the register hole.
There is an exception: complex values together larger than 64 bits are returned in $0 and $1 as seen by the calling function. For these multi-register return values, the called function compensates for the hole, so the calling function sees the register with $0 being the natural first part; like the order allocated for registers.
Structures are returned specially. The caller passes a pointer to an area where the structure contents is to be stored by the called function, regardless of the structure size. The structure-return pointer is passed in register $251.
While it's certainly possible to implement special calling conventions for functions declared to take a variable number of parameters, like printf, there is no need to. The called stdarg function will arrange to map parameter registers to be accessible as a va_list (usually an array). The called function will have to push the parameters that were passed in registers onto the stack before processing them. There's an implicit assumption that stdarg functions don't have to be optimal in terms of speed. Also, this yields simple, easy-to-understand code.
When accessing memory, the address has to get into a register somehow. A common convention is to allocate a register with GREG at the start of a number of memory variables, and use a base-plus-offset expression to translate the address into a register plus offset. That method is restricted to about two hundred such variables (or areas of variables, 256 bytes long) per program.
The ARM, Hitachi SH and others use "constant pools", where each far-away address is kept nearby the code; its address loaded with a GETA equivalent, then using a LDOU to load the real address. On the other hand, these memory accesses appear out of sequence compared to instruction fetches and the "real" memory accesses, a reason to avoid that solution, at least when modeling real hardware. Also, that would mean a GETA and LDOU with the address taking up an octabyte: disregarding possible sharing of addresses, this equals a four-instruction sequence, at least in size.
I chose to use GETA for address loading, leaving it to the assembler and linker to expand it when necessary. This is counter to the goal of using the same conventions as for manually written assembly code. Therefore I'll implement the GREG/base-plus-offset approach as an option, default for standard applications. Anyway, it seems good to at least optionally be lean on GREG allocations, using the GETA approach.
Some ports prepend symbols with underscores to disambiguate register names, but there's no need for that with MMIX. Some use dollar signs ($) or dots (.) to protect compiler-generated symbols; the MMIX port uses colon (:) at strategic places. (See the static chain example.)
A few properties and limitations of gcc affect the MMIX port badly.
As a rule, GCC considers the set of registers that can hold parameters and the set of return-value registers constant. Two other important sets, are the set of call-saved registers and call-clobbered registers. While GCC is written for these sets being constant, they should be chosen dynamically for best MMIX code (even per-call within a function), to e.g. avoid setting L higher than necessary. Unfortunately the possibility of making these properties dynamic, or one a function of the other, is limited at best. For the GCC MMIX port, these properties *are* currently (2001-10-10) constant: registers $0..$14 are call-saved, and $16..$31 are call-clobbered.
Changing these parts of gcc would be a major rewrite.
It is reasonably simple, that at a final pass "rename" registers, for example to close an unused gap between the end of the call-saved registers and the outgoing parameter registers. There's hope that the end result will be reasonably near an optimal register allocation, like the one a skilled human would do.
After mentioning the register allocation limitations, I think I should cheer you up by mentioning that GCC has some provisions for allocating global variables in registers. It doesn't do it automatically, but it should be reasonably simple to interface global register definitions with GREG allocations. I have however not investigated this thoroughly.
To simplify development of the port, I started with a traditional ABI, one where parameters are passed in call-clobbered global registers (same for called and calling function) and where the return value is returned in primarily the first parameter registers. I call this the GNU ABI.
At the moment I don't have any performance figures. Though in my experience, the number of register moves are kept to a minimum if incoming and outgoing parameter register and the primary return value register are the same. On the other hand MMIX instructions being three-operand lessens the importance of that.
Should structures be passed by-value in multiple registers?
If so, there should preferably be a size-threshold. What should be the structure-size threshold for that?
Who should extend passed integers, caller or called function? The 64-bit extension of passed integer types is mainly for ease of use; the programmer who interfaces assembly code to compiler-generated code does not have to remember the exact type passed, "it's an integer, extend or truncate it and pass it in a register" is sufficient for most use. I haven't showed you actual examples of this, because there are some related bugs that cause the code to be quite ugly. That's why I've used "long" in most examples.
Is it useful that the generated code is as mmixal-compatible as possible, even if it results in non-optimal code?
What are your thoughts about the GNU ABI?
The sources for these references can be found at http://www-cs-staff.Stanford.EDU/~knuth/mmix-news.html and (probably, I have not checked) in the MMIX book.
The static chain register is necessary when a function pointer to the nested function is passed to another function, the nested function accessing variables in the enclosed function. The passed function pointer for the nested function is actually points to another piece of code, a trampoline, where the static chain register is loaded. The trampoline then jumps to the nested function, as can be seen in the figure below:
In the "new" C99 standard, there can be names for types of specific sizes, like int64_t, accessible through the <stdint.h> header file. Mapping ordinary C types to specific sizes may therefore not strictly be necessary.
The type long long and its unsigned variant are standard types in the C99 standard.
Version 1.1, March 2000
Copyright (C) 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc. 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
The purpose of this License is to make a manual, textbook, or other written document "free" in the sense of freedom: to assure everyone the effective freedom to copy and redistribute it, with or without modifying it, either commercially or noncommercially. Secondarily, this License preserves for the author and publisher a way to get credit for their work, while not being considered responsible for modifications made by others.
This License is a kind of "copyleft", which means that derivative works of the document must themselves be free in the same sense. It complements the GNU General Public License, which is a copyleft license designed for free software.
We have designed this License in order to use it for manuals for free software, because free software needs free documentation: a free program should come with manuals providing the same freedoms that the software does. But this License is not limited to software manuals; it can be used for any textual work, regardless of subject matter or whether it is published as a printed book. We recommend this License principally for works whose purpose is instruction or reference.
1. APPLICABILITY AND DEFINITIONS
This License applies to any manual or other work that contains a notice placed by the copyright holder saying it can be distributed under the terms of this License. The "Document", below, refers to any such manual or work. Any member of the public is a licensee, and is addressed as "you".
A "Modified Version" of the Document means any work containing the Document or a portion of it, either copied verbatim, or with modifications and/or translated into another language.
A "Secondary Section" is a named appendix or a front-matter section of the Document that deals exclusively with the relationship of the publishers or authors of the Document to the Document's overall subject (or to related matters) and contains nothing that could fall directly within that overall subject. (For example, if the Document is in part a textbook of mathematics, a Secondary Section may not explain any mathematics.) The relationship could be a matter of historical connection with the subject or with related matters, or of legal, commercial, philosophical, ethical or political position regarding them.
The "Invariant Sections" are certain Secondary Sections whose titles are designated, as being those of Invariant Sections, in the notice that says that the Document is released under this License.
The "Cover Texts" are certain short passages of text that are listed, as Front-Cover Texts or Back-Cover Texts, in the notice that says that the Document is released under this License.
A "Transparent" copy of the Document means a machine-readable copy, represented in a format whose specification is available to the general public, whose contents can be viewed and edited directly and straightforwardly with generic text editors or (for images composed of pixels) generic paint programs or (for drawings) some widely available drawing editor, and that is suitable for input to text formatters or for automatic translation to a variety of formats suitable for input to text formatters. A copy made in an otherwise Transparent file format whose markup has been designed to thwart or discourage subsequent modification by readers is not Transparent. A copy that is not "Transparent" is called "Opaque".
Examples of suitable formats for Transparent copies include plain ASCII without markup, Texinfo input format, LaTeX input format, SGML or XML using a publicly available DTD, and standard-conforming simple HTML designed for human modification. Opaque formats include PostScript, PDF, proprietary formats that can be read and edited only by proprietary word processors, SGML or XML for which the DTD and/or processing tools are not generally available, and the machine-generated HTML produced by some word processors for output purposes only.
The "Title Page" means, for a printed book, the title page itself, plus such following pages as are needed to hold, legibly, the material this License requires to appear in the title page. For works in formats which do not have any title page as such, "Title Page" means the text near the most prominent appearance of the work's title, preceding the beginning of the body of the text.
2. VERBATIM COPYING
You may copy and distribute the Document in any medium, either commercially or noncommercially, provided that this License, the copyright notices, and the license notice saying this License applies to the Document are reproduced in all copies, and that you add no other conditions whatsoever to those of this License. You may not use technical measures to obstruct or control the reading or further copying of the copies you make or distribute. However, you may accept compensation in exchange for copies. If you distribute a large enough number of copies you must also follow the conditions in section 3.
You may also lend copies, under the same conditions stated above, and you may publicly display copies.
3. COPYING IN QUANTITY
If you publish printed copies of the Document numbering more than 100, and the Document's license notice requires Cover Texts, you must enclose the copies in covers that carry, clearly and legibly, all these Cover Texts: Front-Cover Texts on the front cover, and Back-Cover Texts on the back cover. Both covers must also clearly and legibly identify you as the publisher of these copies. The front cover must present the full title with all words of the title equally prominent and visible. You may add other material on the covers in addition. Copying with changes limited to the covers, as long as they preserve the title of the Document and satisfy these conditions, can be treated as verbatim copying in other respects.
If the required texts for either cover are too voluminous to fit legibly, you should put the first ones listed (as many as fit reasonably) on the actual cover, and continue the rest onto adjacent pages.
If you publish or distribute Opaque copies of the Document numbering more than 100, you must either include a machine-readable Transparent copy along with each Opaque copy, or state in or with each Opaque copy a publicly-accessible computer-network location containing a complete Transparent copy of the Document, free of added material, which the general network-using public has access to download anonymously at no charge using public-standard network protocols. If you use the latter option, you must take reasonably prudent steps, when you begin distribution of Opaque copies in quantity, to ensure that this Transparent copy will remain thus accessible at the stated location until at least one year after the last time you distribute an Opaque copy (directly or through your agents or retailers) of that edition to the public.
It is requested, but not required, that you contact the authors of the Document well before redistributing any large number of copies, to give them a chance to provide you with an updated version of the Document.
You may copy and distribute a Modified Version of the Document under the conditions of sections 2 and 3 above, provided that you release the Modified Version under precisely this License, with the Modified Version filling the role of the Document, thus licensing distribution and modification of the Modified Version to whoever possesses a copy of it. In addition, you must do these things in the Modified Version:
If the Modified Version includes new front-matter sections or appendices that qualify as Secondary Sections and contain no material copied from the Document, you may at your option designate some or all of these sections as invariant. To do this, add their titles to the list of Invariant Sections in the Modified Version's license notice. These titles must be distinct from any other section titles.
You may add a section entitled "Endorsements", provided it contains nothing but endorsements of your Modified Version by various parties--for example, statements of peer review or that the text has been approved by an organization as the authoritative definition of a standard.
You may add a passage of up to five words as a Front-Cover Text, and a passage of up to 25 words as a Back-Cover Text, to the end of the list of Cover Texts in the Modified Version. Only one passage of Front-Cover Text and one of Back-Cover Text may be added by (or through arrangements made by) any one entity. If the Document already includes a cover text for the same cover, previously added by you or by arrangement made by the same entity you are acting on behalf of, you may not add another; but you may replace the old one, on explicit permission from the previous publisher that added the old one.
The author(s) and publisher(s) of the Document do not by this License give permission to use their names for publicity for or to assert or imply endorsement of any Modified Version.
5. COMBINING DOCUMENTS
You may combine the Document with other documents released under this License, under the terms defined in section 4 above for modified versions, provided that you include in the combination all of the Invariant Sections of all of the original documents, unmodified, and list them all as Invariant Sections of your combined work in its license notice.
The combined work need only contain one copy of this License, and multiple identical Invariant Sections may be replaced with a single copy. If there are multiple Invariant Sections with the same name but different contents, make the title of each such section unique by adding at the end of it, in parentheses, the name of the original author or publisher of that section if known, or else a unique number. Make the same adjustment to the section titles in the list of Invariant Sections in the license notice of the combined work.
In the combination, you must combine any sections entitled "History" in the various original documents, forming one section entitled "History"; likewise combine any sections entitled "Acknowledgements", and any sections entitled "Dedications". You must delete all sections entitled "Endorsements."
6. COLLECTIONS OF DOCUMENTS
You may make a collection consisting of the Document and other documents released under this License, and replace the individual copies of this License in the various documents with a single copy that is included in the collection, provided that you follow the rules of this License for verbatim copying of each of the documents in all other respects.
You may extract a single document from such a collection, and distribute it individually under this License, provided you insert a copy of this License into the extracted document, and follow this License in all other respects regarding verbatim copying of that document.
7. AGGREGATION WITH INDEPENDENT WORKS
A compilation of the Document or its derivatives with other separate and independent documents or works, in or on a volume of a storage or distribution medium, does not as a whole count as a Modified Version of the Document, provided no compilation copyright is claimed for the compilation. Such a compilation is called an "aggregate", and this License does not apply to the other self-contained works thus compiled with the Document, on account of their being thus compiled, if they are not themselves derivative works of the Document.
If the Cover Text requirement of section 3 is applicable to these copies of the Document, then if the Document is less than one quarter of the entire aggregate, the Document's Cover Texts may be placed on covers that surround only the Document within the aggregate. Otherwise they must appear on covers around the whole aggregate.
Translation is considered a kind of modification, so you may distribute translations of the Document under the terms of section 4. Replacing Invariant Sections with translations requires special permission from their copyright holders, but you may include translations of some or all Invariant Sections in addition to the original versions of these Invariant Sections. You may include a translation of this License provided that you also include the original English version of this License. In case of a disagreement between the translation and the original English version of this License, the original English version will prevail.
You may not copy, modify, sublicense, or distribute the Document except as expressly provided for under this License. Any other attempt to copy, modify, sublicense or distribute the Document is void, and will automatically terminate your rights under this License. However, parties who have received copies, or rights, from you under this License will not have their licenses terminated so long as such parties remain in full compliance.
10. FUTURE REVISIONS OF THIS LICENSE
The Free Software Foundation may publish new, revised versions of the GNU Free Documentation License from time to time. Such new versions will be similar in spirit to the present version, but may differ in detail to address new problems or concerns. See http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/.
Each version of the License is given a distinguishing version number. If the Document specifies that a particular numbered version of this License "or any later version" applies to it, you have the option of following the terms and conditions either of that specified version or of any later version that has been published (not as a draft) by the Free Software Foundation. If the Document does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published (not as a draft) by the Free Software Foundation.
To use this License in a document you have written, include a copy of the License in the document and put the following copyright and license notices just after the title page:
Copyright (c) YEAR YOUR NAME. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with the Invariant Sections being LIST THEIR TITLES, with the Front-Cover Texts being LIST, and with the Back-Cover Texts being LIST. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License".
If you have no Invariant Sections, write "with no Invariant Sections" instead of saying which ones are invariant. If you have no Front-Cover Texts, write "no Front-Cover Texts" instead of "Front-Cover Texts being LIST"; likewise for Back-Cover Texts.
If your document contains nontrivial examples of program code, we recommend releasing these examples in parallel under your choice of free software license, such as the GNU General Public License, to permit their use in free software.